Nazirite and Nazarene: evidence cards and answer key
Use your browser’s Print command to print or save as PDF. This worksheet works offline after download; external sources need a connection. Read the companion guide
Original Bibleward reading resource · Numbers 6:1–21 and Matthew 2:19–23. Scripture descriptions are BSB-based paraphrases. The USCCB uses NABRE wording and provides Catholic editorial notes; their tentative interpretations stay attributed. This sheet does not instruct anyone to take a vow or classify a real person’s religious standing.
1. Two completed concept cards
| Field | Nazirite card | Nazarene / Nazorean card |
|---|---|---|
| Passage | Numbers 6:1–21 | Matthew 2:19–23 |
| Immediate subject | A special vow of dedication | Joseph’s return with the child and his mother, and residence in Nazareth |
| Direct evidence | Man or woman may undertake the vow (6:2); rules about vine products, hair, and the dead follow (6:3–8) | Nazareth is the town in 2:23; Matthew connects the designation with the prophets |
| Completion or next detail | Completion includes offerings and shaving, then permission to drink wine (6:13–20) | The paragraph does not narrate a Numbers 6 vow |
| Edition label | Nazirite in the BSB | Nazarene in BSB; Nazorean in NABRE at USCCB |
| Limit | One feature alone does not prove a person’s entire vow status | Similar spelling alone does not establish vow identity |
2. The three-level evidence ladder
| Level | What belongs here? | Worked entry |
|---|---|---|
| T — Text observation | Something the verse actually narrates or stipulates | Numbers 6:2 includes both men and women taking the vow |
| C — Attributed commentary | A named source’s explanation, with its certainty preserved | The USCCB’s Matthew 2:23 note discusses possible prophetic word associations |
| N — Not established here | An inference the assigned evidence does not support | Every person connected with Nazareth must have undertaken Numbers 6’s vow |
A commentary can offer a valuable explanation without becoming part of the biblical text. “Not established here” does not mean the opposite proposition has automatically been proved.
3. Worked correction
Initial note, invented for practice: Similar English letters prove that Jesus took the full Numbers 6 vow.
Revised note: Numbers 6 describes a vow and requirements. Matthew 2:23 supplies a town and designation. The USCCB discusses possible literary connections; the paragraph itself does not narrate Jesus taking that vow. I need additional evidence before making a claim about vow status.
Why it is better: it keeps a text observation, an attributed possibility, and an unproved conclusion separate. It adds no assumptions about a person’s hair, drink, or private commitment.
4. Six classification exercises
Assign T, C, or N and write a locator. Cover the key until you have tried all six.
Numbers 6 includes a woman as well as a man in its opening vow instruction. Category: ___; locator: ____________________.
Numbers 6 describes shaving as part of completion, although cutting the hair was restricted during the vow period. Category: ___; locator: ____________________.
Matthew places the family in Nazareth and connects the designation to the prophets. Category: ___; locator: ____________________.
The USCCB suggests possible associations with Isaiah 11:1 and Judges 13:5, 7 when explaining Matthew 2:23. Category: ___; source: ____________________.
The English spelling proves that every resident of Nazareth observed all Numbers 6 requirements. Category: ___; reason: ____________________.
Numbers 6’s completion arrangements prove that every other biblical person’s dedication had the same duration. Category: ___; reason: ____________________.
5. Answer key
T. Numbers 6:2 identifies a man or woman. The later singular phrasing must be read with that opening scope.
T. Read Numbers 6:5 beside 6:13 and 6:18–20. The restriction during the period and shaving at completion are different moments, not a contradiction created by one action happening twice at once.
T. Matthew 2:23. Record Nazarene for BSB or Nazorean for NABRE. The observation concerns the passage and edition, not a reconstructed etymology.
C. USCCB’s note on Matthew 2:23. Keep “possible associations” visible; do not rewrite it as a proven word derivation or a claim that Matthew supplies those cross-references explicitly.
N. Neither assigned passage supplies such a rule. A town-related designation is not evidence that all its bearers took a specified vow.
N. The completion sequence in Numbers 6 does not establish the duration of every individual dedication mentioned elsewhere. Those cases would need their own passages and review.
6. Blank evidence card
| Field | Your entry |
|---|---|
| Term exactly as printed and translation | ______________________________ |
| Complete passage range | ______________________________ |
| Scene or type of instruction | ______________________________ |
| What the text explicitly gives | ______________________________ |
| Named commentary and exact note | ______________________________ |
| Commentary’s certainty: stated / possible / disputed | ______________________________ |
| What is still not established | ______________________________ |
| Next passage or source to check | ______________________________ |
Use the card for a passage, not for judging someone you know. Keep notes private if they mention a real person.
Sources
BSB Numbers 6 · BSB Matthew 2 · USCCB Numbers 6 · USCCB Matthew 2 and note 2:23 · Berean permissions.
Read the companion guide or choose another reading. Original AI-assisted worksheet; no full Scripture quotation, copied commentary, or individual pastoral endorsement.